1982 BMW 328 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1982 BMW 328. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 324 kg more than 1982 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328. 2005 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1982 BMW 328 has manual transmission. 1982 BMW 328 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 215 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1794 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2890 mm |
