1982 BMW 328 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1982 BMW 328. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 276 kg more than 1982 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (342 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1746 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2890 mm |
