1982 BMW 328 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 328 | Kodiak |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 820 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
