1982 BMW 328 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 328 weights approximately 298 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 328 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 328 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 323 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |