1982 BMW 328 vs. 2008 GMC Envoy

To start off, 2008 GMC Envoy is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 4,159 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 GMC Envoy is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 GMC Envoy weights approximately 635 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.

Because 2008 GMC Envoy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 GMC Envoy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 GMC Envoy (374 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2008 GMC Envoy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.

Compare all specifications:

1982 BMW 328 2008 GMC Envoy
Make BMW GMC
Model 328 Envoy
Year Released 1982 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2793 cc 4159 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 285 HP
Torque 210 Nm 374 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1506 kg 2141 kg
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2880 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]