1982 BMW 328 vs. 2009 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 328 weights approximately 9 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Evanda.
Because 1982 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 BMW 328 (210 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm). This means 1982 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2009 Daewoo Evanda | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | 328 | Evanda |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1497 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2710 mm |
