1982 BMW 328 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 198 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.

Compare all specifications:

1982 BMW 328 2010 Ford Falcon
Make BMW Ford
Model 328 Falcon
Year Released 1982 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2793 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 261 HP
Torque 210 Nm 391 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Vehicle Weight 1506 kg 1704 kg
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2838 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]