1982 BMW 328 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 328 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 328 | Epica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |