1982 BMW 328 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 858 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 328 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 328 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2364 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2916 mm |