1982 Bristol 412 vs. 2000 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 159 kg more than 1982 Bristol 412.
Because 2000 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol 412 | 2000 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Bristol | SsangYong |
| Model | 412 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1851 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
