1982 Bristol 412 vs. 2001 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2001 Mazda AZ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol 412 weights approximately 942 kg more than 2001 Mazda AZ.
Because 2001 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol 412 | 2001 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 412 | AZ |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2370 mm |