1982 Bristol 412 vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 339 kg more than 1982 Bristol 412.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol 412 | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | 412 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 2031 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |
