1982 Bristol 412 vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol 412 weights approximately 122 kg more than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol 412 | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 412 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2380 mm |