1982 Bristol 412 vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 182 kg more than 1982 Bristol 412.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol 412 | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 412 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2946 mm |