1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1957 Buick 40
To start off, 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 1957 Buick 40 | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | Beaufighter | 40 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1795 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3110 mm |