1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1979 Lincoln Mark VI
To start off, 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Lincoln Mark VI weights approximately 74 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 1979 Lincoln Mark VI | |
Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
Model | Beaufighter | Mark VI |
Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2910 mm |