1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Beaufighter | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4690 mm |