1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 50 kg more than 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
Make | Bristol | De Tomaso |
Model | Beaufighter | Longchamp |
Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2610 mm |