1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 225 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Bristol | Dodge |
| Model | Beaufighter | Durango |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4702 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2950 mm |
