1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
Model | Beaufighter | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 222 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2550 mm |