1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 941 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Beaufighter | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 346 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3310 mm |
