1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 690 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
Model | Beaufighter | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2890 mm |