1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2009 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 123 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 2009 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Beaufighter | Sebring |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1873 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2770 mm |