1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 1982 Bristol Brigand is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 87 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 1946 Buick 40 | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | Brigand | 40 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5249 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 109.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1845 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3000 mm |