1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 1963 Bristol 408
To start off, 1982 Bristol Brigand is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Brigand weights approximately 173 kg more than 1963 Bristol 408.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol Brigand | 1963 Bristol 408 | |
| Make | Bristol | Bristol |
| Model | Brigand | 408 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5129 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 98.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 203 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |
