1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 1982 Bristol Brigand is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 842 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 1982 Bristol Brigand is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Brigand. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol Brigand | 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Brigand | Fleetwood |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 7733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 2600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 6240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 98 L |
