1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 1969 Citroen Dyane 4
To start off, 1982 Bristol Brigand is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Dyane 4 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Brigand weights approximately 1164 kg more than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4.
Because 1982 Bristol Brigand is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Brigand. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Citroen Dyane 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 1969 Citroen Dyane 4 | |
Make | Bristol | Citroen |
Model | Brigand | Dyane 4 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 59 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 43 L |