1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 1970 Chrysler 300
To start off, 1982 Bristol Brigand is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 7,209 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Bristol Brigand is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Brigand. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol Brigand | 1970 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
| Model | Brigand | 300 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 7209 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 370 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 109.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3210 mm |
