1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Brigand weights approximately 8 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport.
Because 1982 Bristol Brigand is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Brigand. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Brigand | Trans Sport |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 183 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 84.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3050 mm |