1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 194 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | Brigand | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 241 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1952 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |