1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2006 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 855 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bristol Brigand has automatic transmission and 2006 GMC Canyon has manual transmission. 2006 GMC Canyon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bristol Brigand will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bristol Brigand | 2006 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Bristol | GMC |
| Model | Brigand | Canyon |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2801 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 2613 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |
