1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2006 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2006 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Bristol | GMC |
Model | Brigand | Yukon |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 98 L |