1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 874 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
Model | Brigand | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 391 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 2632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 88 L |