1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2010 Acura RDX
To start off, 2010 Acura RDX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura RDX weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2010 Acura RDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2010 Acura RDX | |
Make | Bristol | Acura |
Model | Brigand | RDX |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |