1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2011 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Brigand weights approximately 253 kg more than 2011 Volkswagen Eos.
Because 1982 Bristol Brigand is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Brigand. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2011 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Bristol | Volkswagen |
Model | Brigand | Eos |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 198 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4423 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1444 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |