1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2012 Audi RS5
To start off, 2012 Audi RS5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Brigand weights approximately 8 kg more than 2012 Audi RS5.
Because 2012 Audi RS5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bristol Brigand has automatic transmission and 2012 Audi RS5 has manual transmission. 2012 Audi RS5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bristol Brigand will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2012 Audi RS5 | |
Make | Bristol | Audi |
Model | Brigand | RS5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 354 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4625 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 63 L |