1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Brigand | E-Series |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.06:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 150 L |