1982 Bristol Brigand vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 348 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2013 Ford Flex is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Brigand | 2013 Ford Flex | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Brigand | Flex |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2256 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1726 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2994 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |