1982 Buick LeSabre vs. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1982 Buick LeSabre. (104 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick LeSabre.
Because 1982 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 1994 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick LeSabre | 1994 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Buick | Daewoo |
| Model | LeSabre | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3205 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 4960 mm |
