1982 Buick LeSabre vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1982 Buick LeSabre. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick LeSabre.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick LeSabre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 2010 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 2010 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick LeSabre | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Buick | Audi |
Model | LeSabre | A6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 178 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2833 mm |