1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 86 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
| Make | Buick | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Skyhawk | 1900 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1883 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |
