1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1963 Holden FB Special
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden FB Special weights approximately 20 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1963 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1963 Holden FB Special | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Skyhawk | FB Special |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
