1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1966 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 192 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1966 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1966 Fiat Grand Break | |
| Make | Buick | Fiat |
| Model | Skyhawk | Grand Break |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1272 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
