1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1975 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1975 Opel Ascona. (90 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1975 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 90 kg more than 1975 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1975 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Buick | Opel |
Model | Skyhawk | Ascona |
Year Released | 1982 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |