1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 weights approximately 479 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 | |
| Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Skyhawk | 240 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3430 mm |
