1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Celica weights approximately 14 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Skyhawk | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |