1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan 260 ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan 260 ZX would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX (124 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX weights approximately 80 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan 260 ZX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1979 Nissan 260 ZX | |
Make | Buick | Nissan |
Model | Skyhawk | 260 ZX |
Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |