1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 735 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
| Make | Buick | De Tomaso |
| Model | Skyhawk | Longchamp |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
