1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1980 Volvo 343
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 343. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 343 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 343. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 343. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 90 kg more than 1980 Volvo 343. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 343 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 343. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1980 Volvo 343 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | 343 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1670 mm |
