1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1983 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 870 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1983 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1983 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Skyhawk | Brougham |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3090 mm |